simple LFO question
Jules Ryckebusch
ryckebu at ersg.san.mrms.navy.mil
Wed Jun 21 21:37:49 CEST 2000
I have the Tom Henry article and have built the "smooth" Phaser (Got 3 of 'em with
single input pannable outputs most excellent stereo effect) I can post the LFO
portion it is a simple design that uses a FET as a voltage "warper" from a schmidt
trigger triangle LFO. Unfortunately the heart of the phaser itself is a SSM2040, so
the rest of the design is hard to do these days. I can draw up the schematic LFO
portion and post if there is interest.
Jules
"Paul R. Higgins" wrote:
> Electronotes had an analog delay design that used an expo converter to drive the
> high-frequency vco. I think that I saw it in the "Builder's Guide".
>
> Someone mentioned the Tom Henry phaser design. This was a DIY feature in
> Electronic Musician years ago titled "The Smooth Phaser". It used a FET-diode
> circuit very much like the tri-sine converter in some of the Electronotes vcos.
> The nonlinear behavior of the FET was exploited to transform a triangle wave
> into something close to a full-wave-rectified sine.
>
> I have an old Hyperflange unit (the Craig Anderton design), and I can say that
> the sweep does indeed sound exponential, even if the hypertriangular wave is not
> exactly the same as a linear triangle feeding an expo converter. (The
> hypertriangular shape is in fact continuously variable). One of the other
> overlooked aspects of the Hyperflange design is its extremely wide
> sweep--something like 72:1.
>
> I remember Anderton saying something to the effect that it's a lot easier to
> make an LFO with an exponential shape than to design a clock circuit that can
> sweep exponentially over a 72:1 range. It does seem to me, however, that
> feeding a triangle into an expo converter would work the same way. Maybe I'm
> missing something, though. My best guess is that Anderton used a CEM3340 to do
> the hypertriangular LFO because it resulted in a much lower parts count when
> compared with an expo converter/LFO circuit; plus, the 3340 LFO could be voltage
> controlled, and even had a sync function.
>
> -PRH
>
> _____________________________________________
> Paul Higgins
> email: higg0008 at tc.umn.edu
> University College, University of Minnesota
> _____________________________________________
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list