Don's favorite source follower
Don Tillman
don at till.com
Sat Jul 1 19:55:33 CEST 2000
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Don Tillman <don at till.com>
From: Haible Juergen <Juergen.Haible at nbgm.siemens.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:16:15 +0200
So ... the circuit is very "musical", and the only remaining
drawback would be the not-so-low output impedance.
Is the output impedance really a problem?
[Replying to myself...]
Maybe the output impedance isn't all that high. For the applications
I'm working on right now I've been using low Idss FETs because I don't
need to drive significant loads.
I've been using the 2N5457-2N5462 series (low, medium and high Idss in
N-channel and P-channel versions) because they seem like a nice set of
devices with low noise, they're readily available, and because I have
a lot of them in my parts collection. It wouldn't surprise me if
there were better devices available.
The 2N5457/2N5460 devices should give you an output impedance around
250 ohms in a complementary source follower circuit without the source
resistors. The 2N5459/2N5462 devices should give you around 140 ohms.
By selecting them for transconductance you could get down to 85 ohms.
The 2SK170/J74 that Erno B uses seems to be very high transconductance
FETs. That should give you about an 18 ohm output impedance. He
claims an output impedance of 2.3 ohms (!!!), maybe he's hand-
selecting higher transconductance devices.
I don't know anything about Erno's FETs -- the 2SK170, 2SK246, and the
2SJ74. Are they readily available?
-- Don
--
Don Tillman
Palo Alto, California, USA
don at till.com
http://www.till.com
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list