To socket or not to socket?

[Magnus Danielson]

From: "Batz Goodfortune" <batzman at all-electric.com>
Subject: Re: To socket or not to socket?
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:06:14 +1000

> Possibly, but I'm led to believe that it's the same stuff pretty much. The
> Americans and British took it back with them and someone gave it to their
> kids to play with. Then someone thought. "Hey I could turn a buck with this
> stuff." From what I understand the only difference is that it comes in
> different colours these days. 

Right. Now we only needs to figure who makes the good stuff.

> >> Whatever it is, this  stuff is hell-fun to play with. It's a total freak
> >> out. You know the movie "Flubber?" Well this is better. :) And unlike
> >> flubber, this stuff exists. I haven't played with it for years but it
> >> freaks me out every time. Even my dog was playing with it. She must have
> >> thought it was alive or something.
> 
> >Animal testing are a touchy subject, you know that ;)
> 
> And my animal is very testing. :)

That is even worse, unsupervised animal testing... ;)

> >> Thanks for making me get it out again Magnus. I can see what I'll be doing
> >> for the rest of the day. :)
> >
> >Well, I have a tendency to get people to do work... I have yeat to be
> promoted
> >to boss thought ;)
> >
> >Chairman of a working group is the furthest I have gone in that sence ;)
> 
> Just give them each a lump of this stuff. Like Harry Bissell's band
> members, you'll be suddenly chairman of a not-working group. :)

They where not working anyhow, so I had no reason to pacify them this way.
I had another guy take over but eventually he also got tired and now the WG
has been closed down. Main reason was that nobody was actually working there,
except maybe for the chairman.

Cheers,
Magnus