OT: Adolf Stalin etc etc.

[Colin Fraser]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: KallKorvI Smvrpapper
> Sent: Mon 25/12/2000 18:31
> To: jhaible at t-online.de
> Cc: synth-diy at node12b53.a2000.nl
> Subject: Re:OT-""Press DELETE"" old TB303 essay, Adolf Stalin etc etc.
>
> This is my last posting in regard
> to the bynow old TB hassle and stress.
>
> I had hoped that the issue was over and done but no!

As far as I can see, you had hoped the issue was over, but hadn't got the
last word in yourself, so decided to take private e-mail public in order to
massage your own (not inconsiderable, and decidedly misguided) ego...

The Adolf Stalin thing in itself was not inherently offensive, though you
obviously really wanted it to be.
But your attitude and conduct toward other members of the list is.

I don't know whether you were ignored as a child, or have some other
personality disorder, but I'm getting really sick of reading your self
important and irrelevant posts.

Why on earth are you on a mailing list for the purpose of learning and
sharing information with others when you seem to think you are better than
the rest of us ?
You are the 'Analog master' anyway, so what do you need to learn ?

If you haven't got anything useful to say, why not just shut up ?

> This because it can be of consolation for those who
> asked relevant contra questions to Juergens email
> about the TB essay in the first place not knowing
> his real intentions about the email and who then
> got complaint emails from other by doing what they did.

Your 303 essay was an innacurate regurgitation of a number of other far less
pretentious 303 essays floating about on the web.
I can see why Juergen's patience ran out...

> This email can be interpreted to be childish, cryptic
> dumb,

Isn't that the interpretation you want people to make, as it seems to be
consistent with your personality, and your desire to stir up negative
response?

> The *whole real* issue was about Adolf Stalin as a
> alias name and not about the TB essay.

In fact, the whole issue is about you being a wanker, and doing your level
best to spoil what has been a great list.
Maybe you're not doing it consciously, which is even more of a shame.
I would hate to think you will go through life an arsehole and not realise
it.

> I don't having problem taking kicks in my ass, no
> more or less then other people are able to accept
> that up to a certain limit off course, but i never
> have said that i don't give back the same amount
> of butt kicking.

This attitude is typical - "I can take criticism", says BJ, "but I will
always return it".

The point of being able to accept criticism is that it may be accurate and
justified.
You *always* insist on returning criticism to your critics, so your supposed
ability to take it is entirely false. Let's face it - you just like to
argue.
You never seem to learn from other peoples criticism, because *you* are
always right, and they are always wrong.
This was blatantly obvious from your response to JHs critique of the 303
rubbish - you invited corrections, he gave them, you responded in your usual
immature manner.

> There are people in this list who claim themselves
> to be open minded, having high tolerance thresholds,
> preachers of free speech, and directly speaking.
> As it seams(as usuall) those who claim so are those
> who in reality has the least of mentioned gifts.
> Which is sad to see. (as usuall)

Warning ! Warning ! Man with his head stuck right up his own ass alert !

BJ - please, get a life.
Go and have sex with someone, and let off that pubescent steam that seems to
be putting your brain under such pressure.


Colin f

PS
Merry xmas etc...