the KORG25 hybrid mystery show comes to an end!

[Adolf Stalin]

> >It IS illegal if a clear copyright statement is on the paper,
> >it dosent matter if the person who uses the copyrighted design
> >for comercial usage has wiped the copyright out and claims
> >that it was not copyrighted.
>
>Legally, if a ckt is not actually oficially patented, then
>anyone can use it commercially, no matter what the opinions and
>wishes of the inventor.
>I'm not saying this is morally justified, just stating the law.

How come that a exact copy of a Van gog painting is ilegal,
just because it was not sold as "a copy of a Van gog"?
What about reverse enginering the painting!!

(wery loooooooong shot!)

Its to late i must go to bed!!
Hmm, my can of prosac is out!..(rattle, shake).......
Well here is another one! :)

> >Allso certain DIY list members shall not forget about the
> >Electronotes copying that took place, that is illegal no
> >matter what you think.Yes i agree about Mr B hutchkins
> >strange ideas etc and all that hassle and stress created,
>
>BH promoted Electronotes membership as a 'club' for the
>exchange of synth ideas. So much of the material in EN was in fact
>supplied by subscribers, entirely without payment (some of these
>people are on this list to this day!). So I think that for some
>ckts at any rate, republishing is not unjustified. So fart as
>legality is concerned, they would have to be redrawn. Again, this
>makes no sense, like so much of the law.

By looking in the archived diylist material i havent
found anything that points to that MR BH offered that?
If so then the complaints from BH are unjustifyed.

If the material was subbed by subbers then Mr BH dosent
have the C-right and that makes it a different matter!Or

Idi Amin
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com