Thomas Henry's MIDI-to-CV Connection
WeAreAs1 at aol.com
WeAreAs1 at aol.com
Fri Aug 18 12:01:08 CEST 2000
In a message dated 8/17/00 10:06:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time, kirke at lmi.net
writes:
<< I'm curious. What do you consider to be limitations
of a software lfo? >>
1. Inability to accurately trace LFO waveform at fast LFO rates (approaching
audio and above).
2. Stepping noise/artifacts. (apparent mostly at slow rates - see #3)
3. Limited low frequency range (analog LFO's can cycle over several minutes
or more - see #2)
4. Inadequate resolution of frequency control. (analog = infinite freq.
resolution)
5. Software LFO's take up precious processing resources, sometimes causing
increased latency in other necessary processes (especailly at high LFO rates)
Yeah, I'm sure that given enough time and enough processing horsepower, you
or some other whiz kid could solve all of these problems in your own homemade
box. However, so far, some or all of these problems remain quite prominent
in all of the commercially available products that have software LFO's.
On the other hand, just about anyone with less than ten dollars worth of
parts and a soldering iron can build a top-quality voltage-controlled LFO
which displays none of those problems.
Michael Bacich
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list