slightly ot: DAT clock deviation
Martin Czech
czech at Micronas.Com
Thu Aug 10 09:32:09 CEST 2000
:::Well, with the recording of the reference signal they are able to do the
:::crosscorrelation. Now, the most straigthforward way to get precission is just
:::to make a LONG recording. Yes, your pseudorandom noise will loop many times,
:::but you don't care. I have been sitting too many nigths listening to the
:::pulsating noise. Now, when you do such a recording, any drifts in clocks is
:::at least fairly limited.
Only problem: computer memory for FFT.
Or I have to look at programs for very long FFT length, like
these earthquake people have... Surely pretty slow.
:::You DO need a steep anti-aliasing filter. You should not settle with less
than
:::8 poles. I would consider both Butterworth, Bessel and Gauss filters to do
the
:::job.
I come to that in a follow up.
:::You could apply the filtering at the input, after the mic-amp and prior to
the
:::S/H section.
I don't think so, because I need the reference signal also, and this is
square pulses.
m.c.
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list