BTW: How about a vcf rating scale?

[ld]

Thanks for graciousness Tom!  Your response leads me to yourself and the rest
of the more knowledgable here to enlighten the rest of us with your own
SUBJECTIVE ratings of all filters personally experienced by yourselves?
I mean say a scale of 1-10 of SUBJECTIVE ratings of each vcf's sonic qualities?

So then how do you rate the 3320 on this scale, with a seperate rating for each
mode, lp, bp, hp and phasor/all pass?  I encourage everyone to contribute their
own ratings for all filters they have owned/used  also..Hopefully this will be
at least somewhat entertaining if not enlightening for all.  thanks
tomg wrote:

> Forget about it. We go on from here..As you are new to the list...chill,
> I've
> used the 3320 a couple of times, others on the list have too. It's not a
> bad
> chip, it's just not the most dramatic filter in the arsenal so we tend to
> favor other designs more.
>
> -tg
>
> > When I started that thread about why no one uses the cem 3320 ..I
> sincerely
> > inadvertedly made the mistake of using tomg work as examples of
> reinventing the
> > wheel..it happened  because I only belong to the diy list and see
> postings
> > related to his stuff everyday so that's what was in the back of my
> mind...Once
> > again I aplogize to tom..whether he believes me or not...I hope this puts
> the
> > matter to rest.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: jar5831.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 167 bytes
Desc: Card for ld
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/19990925/f603aa02/attachment.vcf>