To use CEM or not.WHAT YOU DONT SUFFER ???

[ld]

There! the exact reason why no one is interested in using the 3320's!! THEY
WORK JUST FINE WITHOUT SUFFERING TO MAKE THEM WORK!!
Isn't that the point of this list?? An endless suffering/whining posting
competition on all 4,654,754 different obscure (mostly tempco) components
which if they are not one cent per pound or less no body will buy or supplied
free (stolen (a pocketfull at a time) from ones employer)..AND I HAVEN'T EVEN
MENTIONED
THE EVER POPULAR PCB FOLLIES YET!!  postings like--What?? you expect us to pay
TEN DOLLARS each for a pcb!!!...but of course that is board version
vcf-4.302 every 3 days another version of the vcf   will be posted on the web
site
followed by 18 seperate corrections to be made to each posted here!
WOO WOO!!! ARE WE FINALLY HAVING FUN NOW???

Andrew Schrock wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, John E Blacet wrote:
> > Definitely use analog switches; like some of the Maxim devices which
> > handle +15/-15V signals unlike the old 4066.
>
> I feel a little stupid... as soon as this was pointed out I went and saw I
> had the polyphony article "the PAL filter" in my set of Thomas Henry
> article reprints! I think I skipped over it before because, at the time, I
> wasn't interested in All-Pass/phaser type designs. It's probably easily
> mod-able for HP/LP use.
>
> > Seems like I heard the 3320 was not that great a filter, but I could be
> > wrong. Must be some reason there are soooo many left....Maybe phasing is
> > it's forte?
>
> I've always liked the CEM3320. It's very versatile, even if it doesn't
> have as much "character" as an SSM-2040 or moog lowpass. The 3320 filters
> I have are very quiet, and switchable modes would be the icing on the
> cake. They're also cheap, plentiful, and have a GOOD implementation of
> VC-resonance.
>
> I think Paul asked a while ago.. but I think a MOTM based around the
> CEM-3320 would be a good idea. (If this was covered on the MOTM list I
> apologise, sometimes I don't pay very good attention ;) Maybe Tom would
> like to field a 3320-based filter? The boards would be very small.
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
>
> -| Andrew Schrock | aschrock at cs.brandeis.edu |-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: jar5831.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 167 bytes
Desc: Card for ld
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/19990921/56bfbb1c/attachment.vcf>