[Re: [Elec.Musician Ladder Filter typos]]

[INDRID COLD]

Hi
i agree that stupid schemo is full of problems. however i do have a copy of
the issue with the corrections in my storage locker across town. if you really
want it i can drive down there and pick it up. i don't have access to a
scanner right now but i could fax the article to somebody with a scanner to
post it on the web. let me know. Mike.


Harry Bissell <harrybissell at netscape.net> wrote:
It has too many to mention. Like no bias current input to the CA3080. They
printed the errors list in a later issue, but I could never tell which one,
and after special ordering that issue I'll be DIPPED IN SHIT if i'll buy the
rest of the year just to find out which one it was in. F-'em.
Harry (still P-O'ed after 3 years) Bissell ;-)

Paul Perry <pfperry at melbpc.org.au> wrote:
The ckt for the Moog Laddre filter clone in Electronic
Musician (March 1996) has mistakes.. but, how many?
I know anyone who really wants a ladder shd build Tony
Allgood's one.. but, to satisy my curiosity, has anyone
ever decoded the EM one?

In particular, is R3 110K?
And is pin 2 of the CA3046 going to the right place?

paul perry Melbourne Australia


____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com.


http://indridcold.conk.com
Synth-DIY Webring
http://members.xoom.com/indridcold/signup.htm
got Moog?

____________________________________________________________________
Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1