LM324: was (RE: TL082/TLO84?)

[Scott Gravenhorst]

Tim Curtis <sexsymbol at execpc.com> wrote:
>
>
>Bissell, Harry wrote:
>
>> I don't understand the difference of the TL082 vs 84. There are sometimes
>> problems with amplifiers coupling at the supply pins, and this would be
>> worse in the quad package
>
>Is this what I just had happen with a TL064? It looks like the negative and
>positive pins shorted and the chip burned up internally.
>
>So this is not uncommon?

That sounds rather catastrophic...

As others mentioned, to reduce PS coupling, TL081 with discrete bypass is
best.  And, TL084 is best bang for the buck.

Thank you all very much.

-- Scott Gravenhorst
-- RedWebMail by RedStarWare (srg)
-- FatMan Site: www.teklab.com/~chordman
-- Linux Rex, Linux Vobiscum