AW: Harmonix content formula

[Scott Gravenhorst]

"P.M. van Nugteren" <PMvanNugteren at gmx.net> wrote:
>Ethan Duni wrote:
>> -hmm, couldn't we even argue that numerical solutions are always, one some
>> level, "wrong", because they necessarily involve approximations and, being
>> done in computers, finite-resolution numbers? i wonder how much progress has
>> been made in getting computers to perform symbolic (and hence truly
>> "correct") operations on the level of fourier transforms.. be interesting..
>
>Analogue computers anyone?
>
>Paul

Correct if wrong, but I believe the DIY charter supports discussions
of DSP synthesis as well as other digital synthesis methods.  The
restriction is "do it yourself".  Analogue Heaven is a different list.

-- Scott Gravenhorst
-- FatMan: www.teklab.com/~chordman     | Linux Rex, Linux Vobiscum
-- NonFatMan: members.xoom.com/chordman | RedWebMail by RedStarWare
-- Al Gore: I'm the father of the internet.