slightly ot: room impulse response and inverse impulse response
Doug Tymofichuk
dougt at cancerboard.ab.ca
Tue Dec 21 23:27:55 CET 1999
Hello Martin,
I found this to be fascinating reading, thank you! Some
silly comments follow:
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 15:05:52 +0100 (MET) Martin Czech
<martin.czech at intermetall.de> wrote:
> with complete restauration of the unit impulse shape.
Does this mean the impulse shape gets to eat at a
restaurant? ;-)
(I think you probably meant "restoration".) Isn't english
fun, the rules are never consistant. Of course I should be
quiet, I cannot speak or write a word of German!
> Voice from the off: "This has nothing to do with synth diy".
No, I definitely think it is relevant to artificial sound
creation.
> But this is froozen noise, this
> froozen noise has lost all of it's randomness, it's simply
> a part of the impulse response and it will only add to the
> perception of diffuseness, not to noise, after my
> experiments.
Froozen noise? What the heck is that? The sound of falling
snow? ;-)
Have a great Christmas too!!
----------------------
Doug Tymofichuk
dougt at cancerboard.ab.ca
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list