slightly ot: room impulse response and inverse impulse response

Doug Tymofichuk dougt at cancerboard.ab.ca
Tue Dec 21 23:27:55 CET 1999


Hello Martin,

I found this to be fascinating reading, thank you! Some 
silly comments follow:

On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 15:05:52 +0100 (MET) Martin Czech 
<martin.czech at intermetall.de> wrote:

> with complete restauration of the unit impulse shape. 

Does this mean the impulse shape gets to eat at a 
restaurant? ;-)
(I think you probably meant "restoration".) Isn't english 
fun, the rules are never consistant. Of course I should be 
quiet, I cannot speak or write a word of German!

> Voice from the off: "This has nothing to do with synth diy".

No, I definitely think it is relevant to artificial sound 
creation. 

> But this is froozen noise, this 
> froozen noise has lost all of it's randomness, it's simply 
> a part of the impulse response and it will only add to the 
> perception of diffuseness, not to noise, after my 
> experiments.

Froozen noise? What the heck is that? The sound of falling 
snow?  ;-)

Have a great Christmas too!!
----------------------
Doug Tymofichuk
dougt at cancerboard.ab.ca




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list