Expo convertors with tubes ?
Doug Tymofichuk
dougt at cancerboard.ab.ca
Mon Dec 13 21:33:31 CET 1999
On Sat, 11 Dec 99 07:38:12 Scott Gravenhorst
<chordman at flash.net> wrote:
> "Debby and Gene Stopp" <squarewave at jps.net> wrote:
>
> >May it be justifiable to "pollute" the pure-tube concept
> just >a bit in order to gain the synthesis advantages of
> wide-range tracking >oscillators?
>
> IMHO: For the life of me, I don't get the purist thing at
> all. A circuit that makes a beautiful sound is a good
> circuit.
In my tube percussion synth I will be using tubes whenever
possible in the signal path, because I like the way that
they sound. If I can easily use tubes in other parts of the
circuit such as control, power supply, etc., then I will
for the fun of it. But if it is difficult or impractical to
use tubes, then I am very happy to use solid state. I would
rather spend my time designing and building some novel new
tube effect circuit than trying to invent, for example, a
tube ADSR when a solid state unit will do the job just as
well.
----------------------
Doug Tymofichuk
dougt at cancerboard.ab.ca
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list