[AH] Scope Snapshots of raw vintage analog waveforms

[Haible Juergen]

Roman is perfectly right, of course.
I just forgot about the Minimoog.
And please see also the contribution of Osamu Hoshuyama
about the waveforms not being raw VCO traces.
Which makes http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~WZ4K-TNK/etc/wave.html
not just a great site, but a flawless one, too.
Sorry for the confusion.

JH.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Roman Sowa [SMTP:Roman.Sowa at WizjaTV.pl]
> Sent:	Thursday, August 05, 1999 5:46 PM
> To:	analogue
> Cc:	DIY
> Subject:	ODP: [AH] Scope Snapshots of raw vintage analog waveforms
> 
> > > http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~WZ4K-TNK/etc/wave.html
> > > 
> > 
> > First let me say that I think this is one of the most comprehensive
> > and useful sites on analogue synths I've seen. And I owe its
> > author the most important hint for making a clone of the 
> > old-style Korg MS-20 filter.
> > 
> > Having said that, I must add that I'm not too fond about this
> > very page on synth waveforms. I bet the waveform quoted
> > as "moog ramp" is not typical for a moog triangle wave, but
> > just the result of a misadjusted saw/triangle converter in one
> > particular Moog VCO. (Any Moog owner can confirm / correct
> > this ?)
> 	[Roman Sowa]  
> 	Well, I don't own a moog, but spent much time with its schematics.
> 	The ramp comes from minimoog, where it is one more waveform
> 	aside from saw and triangle. I did it to in my quadVCO module.
> 	Actually I was xfading between saw and trangle to find a sond
> 	not so harsh as saw, but more interesting than triangle.
> 	And guess what, when I decided "this is the one" it appeard
> 	minimog had almost the same ratio (as schematic says).
> 
> 	And I love this site too.
> 
> 	Roman
> 
> 
> >