Memorymoog
WeAreAs1 at aol.com
WeAreAs1 at aol.com
Sun Apr 25 22:29:35 CEST 1999
Fenatic wrote:
<< Sketchy or not,
I think the repair issues on these synths is being overstated, either because
someone wants them devalued ; ) or just sour grapes. Even in the state mine
is in, I know it can be fixed, and to suggest their a lemon is not quite
right. >>
I was a factory-authorized Moog service technician in the Mid-1980's, during
the heyday of the Memorymoog. I was also an authorized service technician
for every other major brand at the time. Memorymoogs were the absolute worst
synthesizers that any service person would ever have to work on. Go ahead,
ask any tech who was active at the time, "What synth was the worst to work
on?", and "Which synth was the most unreliable?". Both answers will ALWAYS
be "Memorymoog", without fail, and without hesitation.
The owners were very unhappy about the situation, as well. Everybody loved
the sound (when they worked), but most were dismayed at how often the units
would need to return for service, and many simply regretted spending their
money on such an expensive, totally unreliable piece of equipment. I
especially felt bad for the entry-level guys who had painstakingly saved
their money so they could buy their first big professional polyphonic synth,
only to have it turn into a service nightmare. Fer Chrissakes, they could
have bought a Prophet V or an OB-8, and they'd actually be out somewhere,
PLAYING, instead of sitting at home, wringing their hands. Touring groups
who were brave enough to take a MM on the road soon found out that they
needed to keep a backup unit handy (although the backup units were
potentailly just as flaky).
Leon Fialkowski, who was at that time the national service manager for Moog
Music, told me that Moog had an over 100% failure rate on Memorymoogs! This
means that they had to handle more Memorymoog warranty service claims than
the number of Memorymoogs they had actually made. There were many units that
were returned to the factory that could not only not be repaired by field
service people, but were unrepairable even by Moog factory technicians.
These units were simply replaced with entire new ones. Obviously, this
additional expense on service put a great financial load on Moog Music, and
certainly contributed to their eventual demise. Do you think that Moog's
service manager would "overstate" the unreliability of a product from which
he earned his own livelihood? If anything, he was probably understating it.
It wasn't just a matter of installing a few clever "service updates" to bring
them up to speed. The factory service updates did help a bit, but I saw just
as many failures with fully updated machines as with unmodified ones.
I'm not suggesting, as Fenatic said, that the Memorymoog is a "lemon". That
would imply, wrongly, that there are "good" ones and there are "bad" ones.
No, I'm flatly stating that it is a badly designed synthesizer. I'm sure
that most of the people who worked at Moog from 1983 to 1987 would completely
agree with me.
These opinions are driven neither by "sour grapes" nor a desire to devalue
the Memorymoog. I've owned lots of Moog gear (more than 12 Minimoogs since
1974, many other models as well), and have had many opportunities to buy
Memorymoogs at very attractive prices. I have a gear collection that would
make most musicians at least a little envious. Sour grapes just doesn't
figure. I don't wish to devalue the selling price of anybody's gear - In
fact, I am pleased with the fact that old synth prices keep rising. This is
as it should be, and for some reason, I haven't had any difficulty finding
good deals when I need them, nor should any other resourceful person. No, my
opinions about the Memorymoog are based in hard-earned experience and
technical knowledge. I really do wish that they were more reliable, because
for some things, they sound incredibly good. The sad truth, however, is that
a working Memorymoog is worth LESS than the Curtis chips that it contains
(the chips are worth somewhere over $1600, at current street prices). As an
avid DIY'er, I'd rather have the chips.
Michael Bacich
P.S. - Kevin Lightner, one of the top Moog technicians on the planet,
simply refuses to work on Memorymoogs anymore. He tells me he values his
sanity too much for it.
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list