AW: adsr and lfo abolish (Don goes off the deep end again)

[Paul Perry]

At 04:58 PM 18/04/99 -0700, you wrote:

>and mate). It would follow that the frequency response cannot be tailored to
>speech, since this is a quite recent development in Darwinian terms. 

What DOES follow is that speech is tailored to the frequency response, as I 
said earlier ;-)

post hoc, ergo propter hoc? Why yes, sometimes!

paul perry Frostwave P/L Melbourne Australia
(knowing that the assumption of causality wont offend anyone on THIS list)

BTW, no replies yet on the viability or otherwise of a multiplexed switched cap 
filter! Any ideas?