VCO argument

[Rory McDonald]

here here! I agree- as far as I am concerned you all are geniuses and I
admire you for your technical prowess- kinda good to know you are human as
well, though!
-Rory

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	List, Christopher [SMTP:Chris.List at sc.siemens.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, April 08, 1999 7:53 AM
> To:	synth-diy at mailhost.bpa.nl
> Subject:	RE: VCO argument
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Sean Costello [SMTP:costello at seanet.com]
> > Sent:	Thursday, April 08, 1999 3:08 AM
> > To:	synth at metasonix.com
> > Cc:	synth-diy at mailhost.bpa.nl
> > Subject:	Re: VCO argument
> > 
> > It's weird to see such a flamewar break out on this list - especially
> > since the people involved are otherwise so amazingly competent. 
> > 
> 	...Yes, and especially when the subject matter is of such an
> objective nature (in general). After all, there's no such thing as "an
> ideal
> VCO", it all depends on your application and what you're trying to
> maximize
> (parts count, cost, range, tracking, easy to obtain parts, etc, etc) - if
> electronics were any different, there'd be only one opamp in the Harris
> catalog!
> 
> 	I've been on vacation this week (dumping mad snow in Lake Tahoe -
> woo yoo!) and just checked my mail for the first time - to find a couple
> hundred messages and all this crazy emotional stuff in the middle of it. I
> was quite surprised. Just build what you think is best and report on it -
> you'll always be helping *some* people.
> 	- CList