Interest Jurgen's Scanning Interpolator PCB?
Henri Kovalainen
hekovala at lyseolukio2.kajaani.fi
Tue Apr 6 19:24:32 CEST 1999
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Don Tillman wrote:
> >IMHO this version seems much more attractive, as I have been told
> >that with moderate matching of the trannies, one can achieve
> >satisfying results.
> I really appreciate Don's variation of the scanner, but "much more
> attractive" hurts. The original version does not require transistor
> matching at all, btw.
> By "attractive" I think he was referring to the tasteful use of color
> in my output plots.
All righty. This is the last time I'll ever express my opinion on the
list =)
> My recommendation would be to:
> use JH's scanner if you want linear transitions or don't like
> matching transistors
>
> use Don's scanner if you want want exponential transitions or
> control over the transition shape
Yeah, I agree. Moreover, last night I started thinking that atleast in
Don's design, it would be quite easy to leave the VCAs out and use the
scanner drive circuit to form a plain waveshaper-thingy. After all, this
is more what I'm probably looking for. I think I'll concentrate on
scanners after I have finished my VCOs...
-------------.
i'mgonnaputo | henri kovalainen hoikankatu 19
nanironshirt | phone: +08-626555 87100 kajaani
andchasesata | irc: AcidRain finland
noutofearth. | http://lyseolukio2.kajaani.fi/~dh
'-
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list