AW: HaiFlai (;.>) update

[Haible Juergen]

	>>the consensus
	>is that for a phaser the best LFO shape is like an inverted full
wave
	>rectified sine, that is, pointy at the top and smooth at the
bottom.
	>>>>
	>Craig Anderton's hyperflanger did this. It's just the sort of 
	>exponential curve that our log sensory circuitry (ears, eyes, etc.)

	>really likes.

Hi John and list,

I remember my very first phaser, OTA-based, when I tried
to modulate (linear) with a sine shape. Not good at all,
and I changed to an expo converter soon.

Now this "invertet FWR sine" waveshape we were talking about
would approximate an expo conversion, too, so it would 
possibly make a linear modulation circuit more acceptable.
But just to be sure - the idea was to apply this waveform
to an *expo* modulation input, to further improove *this*
kind of modulation, wasn't it ? Or would this be over compensation ?

JH.