wierd ring type thing...

[media at mail1.nai.net]

At 10:07 AM -0600 03/31/98, R.G. Keen wrote:
>No second oscillator, not a ring mod.

I'm just passing through, but that makes sense to me.  Anyway, here's a
half baked idea:  how about taking the original signal and a variation of
that signal (like it octaved, squared-up, or phased shifted) and using them
as the two inputs of a ring modulator??

I'll be back later to make up more intransitive verbs :)


PEACE OUT :)
MARK