e*ectr*notes

Andrew Schrock aschrock at cs.brandeis.edu
Fri Jun 19 19:23:42 CEST 1998


On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Tony Clark wrote:
>    You know, I've been watching this banter go on for over a year now.  
> Some will argue that the electronotes collection is by far one of the 
> best sets of synth related building sets in existance, but on the other 
> hand, having to go through the hassle of "getting" it makes it totally 
> unappealing (to me and others).
>    Why don't we start our own definitive collection of circuits?  Most 
> circuits that I've run across are just variations of stuff that has 
> already been published in one form or another.  To prevent people like BH 
> from blowing a gasket, all circuits should prove where the individual 
> parts come from to prevent any form of "copy" complaints.
>    What do you guys think?

I think it's a great idea. There are already many many circuit
repositories across the net, enough for anybody to build almost any synth
they could imagine.. but they're either unorganized groups of messages 
(like hyperreal) or a small number of gifs/jpgs in somebodys directory
(like most everybody else, which is GOOD, but there's no linked structure
between them).

There's no real COMPLETE repository. This complete repository we're
talking about could be either on-line or in hardcopy, or both. Both have
advantages and disadvantages, but I think at least some sort of baseline
collection for synth modules using common parts is in order. 

Andrew




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list