Filter Layout question
Fraser, Colin J
Colin.Fraser at scottishpower.plc.uk
Fri Dec 11 10:09:30 CET 1998
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Schrock [mailto:aschrock at cs.brandeis.edu]
> Sent: 11 December 1998 02:36
> To: Rob
> Cc: synth-diy at mailhost.bpa.nl
> Subject: Re: Filter Layout question
>
> IMO, seperate jacks for different passes all the way. It's
> nice to have
> the option to mix the outputs. I believe the concensus is
> that it's bad to
> make modular gear with lotsa switches to go between
> modulations.. sorta
> defeats the purpose, plus once you've filled up a box with switches,
> you'll have trouble expanding.. plus it doesn't look as cool.
>
I agree with that - what's a patch lead if it's not just a highly flexible
'switch', with outputs as 'contacts'.
The only switches in my modular are to save having to pull patch leads out
to turn off oscillator sync.
I prefer to use a cross-fade knob rather than a switch.
I have 2 SEM type filters - they have a knob to fade between the hi and lo
pass outputs, and another knob to fade between the hi/lo output and the
bandpass. They have a final output for the crossfades, plus separate hi and
lo direct outputs.
The next stage will be to add a Haible Interpolating Scanner when I have
time (christmas holiday coming up...)
Sweeping between different filter mode outputs is a feature well worth
having.
Colin f
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list