wierd ring type thing...

Ken Stone sasami at blaze.net.au
Wed Apr 1 00:27:26 CEST 1998


>At 10:07 AM -0600 03/31/98, R.G. Keen wrote:
>>No second oscillator, not a ring mod.
>
>I'm just passing through, but that makes sense to me.  Anyway, here's a
>half baked idea:  how about taking the original signal and a variation of
>that signal (like it octaved, squared-up, or phased shifted) and using them
>as the two inputs of a ring modulator??

rather pointless. Ring mods are really only any fun when the frequencies of
the two signals are different. An octave shift isn't different enough.

anyone care to put this in tech-speak? :)

>
>I'll be back later to make up more intransitive verbs :)
>
>
>PEACE OUT :)
>MARK
>
>
>
>
>
>
_____________________________________________________________

                Ken Stone  sasami at blaze.net.au
                   ** Catgirl Paradise **
               <http://www.anime.net/~kens/>
         ** Australian Miniature Horses and ponies **
             <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>
_____________________________________________________________





More information about the Synth-diy mailing list