Unisyn 1.2 Opinions

[Mark Pulver]

>>Has anyone had experience with the MidiQuest Software?
>
>I think the big difference between Unisyn and MIDIQuest is that MIDIQuest
>works. Even if the graphic representations are a little less sexy. If you
>like figthing with software go for UniSyn. If you just wanna get the job
>done, MIDIQuest is a good choice. You might also wanna have a look at XOR.
I
>don't know what that's like these days but when I tried it I found that
>whilst it was graphically challenged, it was also bullet proof.

Batz; dude... You missed the switch... 

Emil Tobinfield sold off Dr. T's, and the rights to X/oR went to MOTU who
ended up taking the Windows side of the product and rewhacking it into
Unisyn for Windows.

And you're right... X/oR for Windows was a MUCH more stable product than
Unisyn for Windows is.


That just goes to show you what a good 14 months of development and a 3
month beta cycle will do for ya'. :)

It's funny, 'cause the Good Doctor ("T") himself was even standing over the
shoulders of the MOTU coding folks for part of the transition period.


Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Mark Pulver - http://shoga.wwa.com/~mpulver    The "Son of The MIDI Wall"
   * Gear Wanted List!! ==> http://shoga.wwa.com/~mpulver/gwlist.html *