exponential rising

[Patrik Erikson]

At 19:42 1996-11-28 +0100, you wrote:

>Besides, both curves are exponential and none of the is logarithmic, what
>differs is their polarity and what the offset levels are. This is quite a 
>diffrent thing than saying a curve is logarithmic.

Hrm.... yes... Got me there... This mess got me diggin' out some of my
electronics books, and my old math books to clear things out... And, oh,
yes. I think what's inverse was some of my thoughts... :-)

>BTW. logarithmic and exponential is sometimes missused and interchanges or used
>with the anti- prefix to add to the confusion....

I'll sign to that! Anyway, I'll rather stick to my soldering iron than
walking further out on thin ice of theory...  There's no sound from a theory
either! :-)

        Peace!

        /P.
 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
|                               |                         |               |
|  Patrik Eriksson              |  Get connected:         | Shoe size:46  |
|  Proud MOOG user              |  Phone: +46 90 198522   |_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _|
|  - - - - - - - -              |         +46 70 5636783                  |
|  Historiegrand 12A:111        |  Email: me95pen at ing.umu.se              |
|  S-907 34 UMEA SWEDEN         |  URL: http:// www.ing.umu.se/~me95pen   |
|_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _|_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _|