Analog (Mis)information
Matt Haines
haines at quick.net
Sat May 18 06:31:37 CEST 1996
Peen torpid gusto jelly scuba don at till.com purloin fargo dimple tango.
> Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 23:47:12 -0800
> From: haines at quick.net (Matt Haines)
>
> > Hello, fellow analoguers -
> > I was browsing the web, and found this poor misguided
> > chap saying things like " The filter has little to do with the
> > "sound" as that word is normally used..." (in reference to
> > the MiniMoog).
>
> We all did this conversation about a month ago. Where were you?
>
>I *think* what happened was that we had this conversation on AH a
>while ago, DBALVAGE independently posted this to SYNTH-DIY, and you
>just replied to that but sent your reply to back AH instead.
>
You're right, I musta hit the wrong macro. And I was just being crotchety
then, so don't mind me. I've taken my medication and am much better now. :)
>But really, it's not a big deal. While he's written the text in an
>inflammatory manner, Hinton's got a very important point: When you're
>treating the synth as a Musical Instrument, the total effect of all
>the little things that contribute to the soul and the spirit of the
>playing experience is far more important than how much third harmonic
>distortion is present when the filter is being overdriven. So in that
>context, a solid feel of the keyboard, a hardwood case, quality pots
>that respond to the touch, the right controls doing the right things,
>all that stuff is far more inportant to him than the specific circuit
>used in the filter because he's treating the beast holistically as a
>Musical Instrument.
>
>I can't disagree.
>
Same here. Before that thread started, I often wondered how much the effect
was on myself. I know there IS some effect of user interface and
ergonomics, but it's not the ONLY thing either. Fr'instance, does an MKS30
sound better/worse than the JX-3P? They're the same circuitry (I
think...pick another example if I'm wrong) but one's a keybord with a
slider and flashing lights, and the other's a rackmount version. These
factors could easily lead one to find differences where there aren't any.
Here's a personal example: I'm not fond of the sliders on the Odyssey. So
when it comes time to mess around with synths to find a sound, I turn to
the Odyssey lastm because it's a pain. That negative feeling, if I'm not
careful, can be converted into a feeling of "the Odyssey sucks, including
the sound". Which is definitely not the case!
Since I've now made this part of two lists, I'll cc DIY.
>(Some of his stuff is dead wrong though. The line about 4-pole
>filters not lending themselves to theoretical analysis for instance.)
>
> -- Don
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
Matt Haines haines at quick.net . . . .
control-X:to:abort:transmission . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
Official Warning: The opinions expressed above are not necessarily my own.
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list