Tracking Generators
gstopp at fibermux.com
gstopp at fibermux.com
Fri Jan 19 18:07:20 CET 1996
The technical description of a "tracking generator" would probably be
a "variable non-linear transfer function amplifier". What this means
is you could draw a graph of the output voltage as a function of the
input voltage, and the graph would not be a straight line but rather
some complex curve that can be varied by the user.
A crude version of this function could be accomplished with a ladder
of analog comparators that in turn drive a row of voltage pots, so
that each input voltage level could trigger a certain arbitrary output
voltage. However the output of such a device would be chunked into as
many discrete steps as there are comparators, and any "smoothing"
function to round off the steps would be once again frequency
sensitive. Increasing the number of steps would allow a smoother
output, as long as the voltage values do not vary considerably from
step to step.
Taking this to the extreme case would be best done digitally. You
could somehow build a table of numbers in RAM that would be sent to a
D/A converter, with an A/D converter on the input sweep voltage
controlling the addresses in the table. Now the tricky part becomes
the data entry human interface. With a processor (like in a
digitally-controlled synthesizer) it's easy.
However the "interpolating scanner" concept that Juergen has
implemented sounds like a quite useful way to generate
time-independent non-linear transfer functions, using crossfading
VCA's to "morph" between the steps. It seems to me that you would need
to convert the input sweep voltage to a series of trapezoidal
functions that are staggered in level (is this how you do it,
Juergen?).
- Gene
gstopp at fibermux.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Tracking Generators
Author: Haible_Juergen#Tel2743 <HJ2743 at denbgm3xm.scnn1.msmgate.m30x.nbg.scn.de>
at ccrelayout
Date: 1/19/96 12:01 PM
> Could you hook a CV sequencer into an integrator? This would be more
> modular, if it does what you want.
Like all staircase / integrator methods it has the drawback of being
terribly frequency dependant.
JH.
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list