SSM2040 CAT dilemma...

jupiter4 jupiter4 at bt-sys.bt.co.uk
Fri Dec 13 16:56:46 CET 1996


Hi,

One solution might be to buy my Digisound State variable filter bank. It is a
custom 19inch rack mounting version with 2 state varible filters in it. I am
after 250 quid for it and I live in the UK.
Alternatively, I have a single State variable fully built with SSM2040 but it
doesn't work ( it used too, I haven't had time to find out what is wrong). I
don't think the SSM2040 is dead tho... I could check this by swapping it into
the dual unit (which I think i did once). I am after 75 quid for this one,
this has the normal 9*3 inch front panel.

Cheers, Dave...
_______________________________________________________________________________
To: synth-diy at horus.sara.nl
From: Matthew S. Padden on Fri, Dec 13, 1996 4:29 pm
Subject: SSM2040 CAT dilemma...
RFC Header:Received: by maczebedee with ADMIN;13 Dec 1996 16:28:38 U
Received: from mailhub.axion.bt.co.uk by rambo.futures.bt.co.uk with SMTP
(PP);
          Fri, 13 Dec 1996 16:28:54 +0000
Received: from ns1.sara.nl by mailhub.axion.bt.co.uk with SMTP (PP);
          Fri, 13 Dec 1996 16:20:17 +0000
Received: from horus.sara.nl (horus.sara.nl [192.16.188.40]) 
          by ns1.sara.nl (8.8.3/8.7.1) with ESMTP id RAA11195;
          Fri, 13 Dec 1996 17:13:15 +0100 (MET)
Received: by horus.sara.nl (8.8.3/4.03) id QAA08756;
          Fri, 13 Dec 1996 16:11:29 GMT
Received: from relay.surfnet.nl by horus.sara.nl (8.8.3/4.03) id QAA106287;
          Fri, 13 Dec 1996 16:11:27 GMT
X400-Received: by /PRMD=surf/ADMD=400net/C=nl/; Relayed;
               Fri, 13 Dec 1996 17:11:24 +0100
X400-Received: by mta relay.surfnet.nl in /PRMD=surf/ADMD=400net/C=nl/;
Relayed;
               Fri, 13 Dec 1996 17:11:24 +0100
X400-Received: by /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD= /C=gb/; Relayed;
               Fri, 13 Dec 1996 17:10:37 +0100
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 17:10:37 +0100
X400-Originator: "m.s.padden" <m.s.padden at hud.ac.uk>
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/;<31DAD66A1E at pegasus.hud.ac.uk>]
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2)
Content-Identifier: SSM2040 CAT d...
Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
From: "Matthew S. Padden" <m.s.padden at huddersfield.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <31DAD66A1E at pegasus.hud.ac.uk>
To: synth-diy at horus.sara.nl
Subject: SSM2040 CAT dilemma...
Organization: The University of Huddersfield HEC
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail/Mac v2.02
Sender: owner-synth-diy at horus.sara.nl
Precedence: bulk

Hi DIYheads..

	Here's a dilemma. I have an Octave CAT synth, very fine indeed. I also have 
most of the Digisound schematics, and would dearly love to build the 80-5 
state variable VCF (LP, HP, BP all at 12 or 24dB slope, notch) which 
uses....an SSM2040. The CAT's (very good, but rather suddenly appearing 
resonance) VCF uses.... an SSM2040. This is the only SSM2040 chip I have 
ever seen anywhere. So the dilemma is, do I keep the CAT as is, or remove 
the SSM2040 to build the 80-5 VCF and route the CAT through it when I need 
to? Bear in mind if the chip dies, I'm stuffed.

	Press your answer buttons now....

--
Matthew S. Padden
Computer Music Research Group
Music Dept.
Huddersfield University
Queensgate
Huddersfield
England HD1 3DH
p: +44 1484 422288 x2402
f: +44 1484 472656
e: m.s.padden at hud.ac.uk




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list