While we're talkin' about SSM VCA's...
gstopp at fibermux.com
gstopp at fibermux.com
Sat Apr 13 00:44:14 CEST 1996
I guess what I'm trying to do is come up with some discrete designs
for all types of synthesizer modules to get around the chip
availability problems. Also building discrete circuits gives total
control of all parameters, like pulse width modulation thresholds and
envelope times and low/high frequency ranges etc. You can bring out
all the guts for input and output, and whether or not these get used
is the option of the builder. And always the goal is to make them with
parts that anybody can get, not just industry engineers who play golf
with distributor reps every week.
Chips, whether they are available or not, are really intended for mass
production. You can see that AD chips are geared for console
manufacturers, for example. Some of them have specifications that are
so good that it's hard to justify building a discrete version, like
the AD multipliers or the SSM precision parts, but they cost a lot of
money and you have to special-order them.
Some DIY gear is a one-time deal, for personal benefit. I can safely
say that I'll never build another Frequency Shifter now that I have
one, and it's got four AD532's in it (which are considered obsolete by
AD, BTW). But how will we ever not need another VCO? Or VCF, or
envelope generator? These modules are the bread and butter of analog
enthusiasts, and even when one enthusiast gets his fill and calls it
quits, another young one sprouts up with a fresh demand.
- Gene
gstopp at fibermux.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: While we're talkin' about SSM VCA's...
Author: Christopher List <Christopher_List at sonymusic.com> at ccrelayout
Date: 4/12/96 4:47 PM
ps.
Gene, are you staying away from the in-production SSM chips as well? - For fear
that they might be discontinued? BTW, thanks for the VCF posts....
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list