Substrate temperature stabilized
Rick Jansen
sscprick at horus.sara.nl
Thu Jun 8 14:18:52 CEST 1995
Haible_Juergen wrote:
> > (I believe that the transistors [in a MAT-04] are "better" than
> > in a 3086, but I thought 3086 transistors were good enough, when
> > the temperature effects would be cancelled.)
Opinions on this seem to vary a lot, so the only way to really find
out is to actually build the circuits I guess. At least the MAT-04
offers a technical possibility to reach the quality level of the uA726
at comparable cost. The temperature control circuitry isn't cheap,
the LM329 costs ca US$ 6,-, but we're only building a few, not thousands
I guess. The drawback of course is that the MAT-04 is only made by
PMI, which has just been taken over by Analog Devices(?), so there's
a chance the availability is not guaranteed in years to come. The LM3046
is extremely common, and second- and maybe even triple-sourced.
The Old Crow wrote:
> According to National Semiconductor specs and appnotes, the LM3046
> (LM3086), when used in a feedback temperature stabilized circuit, has an
> exponential conformity of 0.25% from 20Hz to 15KHz, which is just fine as
> far as I'm concerned.
You have a point there of course. At lower frequencies the exp conformity
is much better than 0.25%, and I guess most of us won't use VCO's above
a few kHz, or do we have bats on the list?
I'm now leaning again towards a 3046-based circuit:
Part Pro Con
------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------
LM3046/CA3046 cheap Less log conformant
Available
Substrate temperature controllable
MAT-02/LM394 Excellent characteristics External temp control
Available Price? (ca. US$ 20,-)
MAT-04 Excellent characteristics No 2nd source
Available Price? (ca. US$ 20,-)
Substrate temperature controllable
uA727 Excellent characteristics Unavailable
Substrate temperature controlled
So, I'll go for the 3046 and try a MAT-04 as another experiment.
Rick Jansen
__
rick at sara.nl http://www.sara.nl/Rick.Jansen
_____________________________________________
S&H's a module and s&h's looking good
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list