<div>I agree with Jim. The THAT340 can be wired to be an OTA replacement. I would have the THAT300 and THAT320 tied for second place. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>peng<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/30/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">James Patchell</b> <<a href="mailto:patchell@cox.net">patchell@cox.net</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">If he needs to prioritize...I would say THAT340 would be first, followed by<br>THAT320.  The THAT300, which is a quad NPN would be third.
<br><br>At 01:45 PM 1/30/2006 -0600, Scott Stites wrote:<br>>Hi List,<br>><br>>I asked Steve Daniels of Small Bear if he could also stock THAT matched<br>>transistors.  He asked me which part number, and it occurred to me that
<br>>perhaps the list here would have a better idea of what array would be most<br>>useful.<br>><br>>Info on THAT's transistor arrays is here:<br>><br>><a href="http://www.thatcorp.com/300desc.html">http://www.thatcorp.com/300desc.html
</a><br>><br>>So, what device(s) would prove most useful to you all?<br>><br>>Thanks,<br>>Scott<br>><br>><br>>________________________________________<br>>PeoplePC Online<br>>A better way to Internet
<br>><a href="http://www.peoplepc.com">http://www.peoplepc.com</a><br><br>        -Jim<br>***************************************************************<br><a href="http://www.oldcrows.net/~patchell">http://www.oldcrows.net/~patchell
</a><br><br>***************************************************************<br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>