<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2650.12">
<TITLE>RE: [sdiy] out in the open</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>The point seems to be that not crediting the originator of the design is</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>rude and maybe unethical..... Its not illegal in the least.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>----------------</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>And again, I'll say that we're ASSUMING there should be credit given.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>----------------</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>The second problem is that it impedes the free flow of information on</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>list, as people get offended when their ideas are liberated with no</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>credit.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>----------------</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Again... we're still propogating hearsay aren't we?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>----------------</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but in a court of law, wouldn't it be up to</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> YOU to prove that he did? I mean, isn't all this going on an</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> assumption from a front panel and brief description? The 'guts' could</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> still be entirely different. I mean, how many thousands of ways can</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> you implement filters?</FONT>
</P>
<CODE><FONT SIZE=3><BR>
<BR>
**********************************************************************<BR>
This email and any files attached are confidential and<BR>
intended solely for the addressee. This email message<BR>
has also been swept for computer viruses by<BR>
MIMEsweeper (www.mimesweeper.com)<BR>
**********************************************************************<BR>
</FONT></CODE></BODY>
</HTML>